Masthead header

Contingency Fee Agreement Tax

Tax disputes can also be resolved in the event of a contingency. Say Dennis` statement was verified in 2013. His accountant represented him, but the IRS eventually issued an opinion on the proposed adjustment, in which he asked for an additional $1 million in taxes. Can Dennis hire a tax advisor to represent him in the event of a protest and then to the IRS Complaints Department on a conditional royalty basis? Of course, because this is a challenge for the IRS for Dennis` initial return. It turns out, however, that the tax advice or representation for contingency costs is the exception, not the norm. One place where conditional fees can be particularly helpful is where the taxpayer tries to recover money from the IRS in a lawsuit. Repayment remedies may be appropriate for conditional taxes and the IRS has authorized contingency taxes in this context. Yes, it is true, it is an area regulated by the IRS. Whether your tax advisor can provide services in the event of an eventuality therefore depends on the contingency costs authorized by the IRS. In the orders known as Circular 230, the IRS states that a practitioner cannot collect conditional royalties for services provided in connection with any matter before the IRS, with three exceptions. Commercial expenses must be normal and necessary to be tax deductible. But the IRS has always held that lawyers cannot deduct these fees if lawyers can be reimbursed later, at the end of the proceedings.

For most conditional pricing agreements, the client pays nothing (not even the fee) unless there is recovery. For some pricing agreements, costs are deducted from the customer. In other countries, fees are deducted from the tip before the client and lawyer share the rest. But the IRS has long wanted uniform tax treatment. The IRS wanted Congress to ensure that the ninth lawyers on the Circuit Commission were in agreement with all the others. But the fact that the tax bill does not include IRS fixing means that california lawyers can still have gross royalty contracts if they wish. It gives the lawyers in the 9th circle a choice. Should lawyers seize it with the survival of the gross royalty agreement in the ninth circle? It is not just a tax issue.

This is a bit of profitability and maybe even marketing. And it can have an impact on lawyers` compensation. But the tax reform law did not eliminate the election. Conditional legal fees are common in cases of personal injury. They are also increasingly the norm in labour law litigation. Indeed, the diversity of cases where legal fees are common continues to grow. Today, even large law firms can deal with certain contingencies. So how about paying your tax advisor a percentage of the taxpayers` money they save you? It should come as no surprise that customers demand it.